Showing posts with label Serge Gainsbourg. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Serge Gainsbourg. Show all posts

Thursday, April 17, 2014

On the next episode of MadMen . . .



Don and Meaghan go to Paris and meet Serge Gainsbourg and Brigit Bardot.

No, not really, but I can dream.

Happy birthday, Ford Mustang. Leave it to the French and Serge to sum up your very American, very international appeal.

* * *

But my original idea isn't so ridiculous. Although I kinda suspect Brigit could manger Meaghan for le petit déjeuner.





Friday, September 16, 2011

Serge protector

"Comment te dire adieu"--Probably my favorite Serge Gainsbourg song, as performed by Françoise Hardy.



One benefit of this video--other than getting to hear and see Françoise Hardy perform--is that someone transcribed the lyrics of the song for the viewer. Thus, even if you don't know French well or much at all, you get a sense of the cleverness of the words she is singing.

I'm sorry, but Jimmy Sommerville cries himself to sleep at night wishing he could be this good.

* * *

Oh, and here are some more to choose from, but hélas, I can't embed these like I want to.

Catch them while you can on YouTube:
I especially like the video for "Ballade de Melody Nelson." If I recall correctly, it was made in the early '70s for a French TV special, it seems very modern with it's repeated "video sample" of Jane Birkin tossing her hair everytime she sings "Melodeeeee Nelsonnnnn."

"Sea, Sex, and Sun" is terrific disco froth. No explanation needed. And "Bonnie and Clyde" and "Requiem pour un con" ("Requiem for a jerk") show the grittier side of Serge, one that isn't so busy playing the pervy ol' troll.

What to make of all the leering and "luridity" of ol' Serge, though? In the biography, Serge Gainsbourg: A Fistful of Gitanes, Sylvie Simmons reports Jane Birkin saying that Serge was actually quite pudique. (Jane claims that there's no English equivalent for this word; my French-English dictionary says it means "modest." Close enough.) And yet he loved to write songs with suggestive lyrics and themes--"Les sucettes," sung by poor France Gall, who definitely did not get that the song's subtext referred to oral sex; "Melody Nelson" and "Sea, Sex, and Sun" both telling the tale of older men involved in relationships with Lolitas; and "Lemon Incest," a duet with his pubescent daughter, Charlotte Gainsbourg, that namechecks a thankfully only metaphysical love that dares speak its name in the title.

Was Serge a creep? I think he was more self-consciously creepy than an actual creep, although the latter musical example certain gets up the nose of my sensibilities, to be sure. From the sound of it, ol' Serge liked to provoke, to shock, to upset. That's all well and good; sometimes we all need to be shaken out of our mental ruts and rigidity, whether we want to or not. I kind of loved a few years ago when there were those "marriage-ins" in San Francisco, and a certain element of our overstimulated, overly testy population, got so worked up about it, that somehow same-sex couples marrying en masse and with bravado was the ultimate scourge to human society. Too, too funny.

And, after a while, too, too easy. Some people are so easy to shock; it makes it hardly a challenge. In the case of Serge, while that tendency to shock probably came from his outsider status (an intelligent man operating in a frothy, "baby pop" world; his homely, not-matinee-idol looks; his Jewishness in a post-war France that would just as soon have forgotten about its past role in the war), after a while, late in life, the repeated attempts to provoke just seemed too self-conscious, too eager, and, ultimately, too desperate. Where's the fun in that?

Nonetheless, in general, I love Serge's music, his lyrics (what I can understand of them at least), and the different personae he created to convey his songs. I just wish he had left poor France Gall alone. She had to be pretty innocent--or really dense--not to get the subtext of "Les sucettes."



But it's kind of sad all the same. And, again, too, too easy.

Thursday, September 15, 2011

You ought (not) to be in pictures

What a world we live in to spend so much time and energy focused on some old scandal-prone slag with fascist tendencies.

I'm of course talking about Bessie Wallis Warfield Spencer Simpson Windsor, the subject of Madonna's new movie, W.E. Honest.

The week's best headline (so far) comes to us in French from the online daily news site, Cyberpresse.ca, based in Montréal.

I translate the headline, "Madonna cinéaste? Hélas, pas encore . . ." in two ways:

"Madonna a filmmaker? Alas, not yet . . ."

Or my preferred version, "Madonna a filmmaker? Good grief, not again . . . ."

I suspect the former is more accurate, but the latter is more fun to read--and closer to world opinion, I would imagine.

I won't translate the entire article--we'd be here all day and then some--but in the second paragraph, the author remarks on the "obstinancy with which Madonna applies herself to cinema to be both touching and troubling."

Or possibly just really, really tiresome.

* * *

I've just finished a biography of the famed French composer of popular song (and all-around provocateur), Serge Gainsbourg (Serge Gainsbourg: A Fistful of Gitanes by Sylvie Simmons), in which the author contemplates Serge's possible frustration with his creative, uh, oeuvre. Monsieur Gainsbourg successfully composed  musically and lyrically innovative, clever, and appealing popular songs for himself and many others and was always striving for new sounds, expanding the bounds of language, and challenging himself and others with his work.

And yet . . . he also attempted to write, paint, photograph, make commercials (!), and make films, with varying degrees of success, all perhaps as a way to be seen as more "serious." Simmons speculates that Gainsbourg did so because he didn't fully appreciate his songwriting, because composing came so easily to him and because he was writing pop songs, not heavy, more "consequential" works.

The author of the Cyberpresse article makes some of the same points about Madonna, that her filmmaking is a way to be taken seriously, when, in fact, she's already very good at what she does.

If history serves as a guide, I don't think any of the critics--or me--are bound to change Madonna's mind, that's for sure. If the critical or popular reaction to Swept Away, The Next Best Thing, Body of Evidence, or Shanghai Surprise didn't do it, clearly nothing will.