Wednesday, March 09, 2016
Sunday, February 07, 2016
You know you live in Canada when . . . (Part 35,985,751)
. . . one of the local supermarket chains (Sobey's) is promoting the serving of "game day poutine" for the Superbowl.
Better idea: Skip the football game, keep your regurgitated nachos, and just pass me a steaming plate of French fries, brown gravy, and cheese curds, better known as the snack food of the Gods, also known as poutine.
Which is Quebecois French for "kiss my maple-flavoured buttocks, gringo." At least that's what it says in the citizenship prep test booklet.
Better idea: Skip the football game, keep your regurgitated nachos, and just pass me a steaming plate of French fries, brown gravy, and cheese curds, better known as the snack food of the Gods, also known as poutine.
Which is Quebecois French for "kiss my maple-flavoured buttocks, gringo." At least that's what it says in the citizenship prep test booklet.
Saturday, February 06, 2016
The sounds of silenzzzzzzz . . .
Yeah, sorry, I know I should, but I really don't give a tuppence about Bernie Sanders or the 2016 presidential election in the United States.
Oh, I can still vote in the U.S., a fact I seem to have to keep reminding Americans of. I just have a work permit for Canada after all; I didn't have to give up my citizenship to move here.
Nor would I do so, despite recently having begun the process of applying for permanent residency here. I miss the United States. More than I thought I would. It is still home, and I still worry about it. Is it eating alright? Is it getting along with others? Is it happy? Has it killed anyone lately, by accident or on purpose? Or is it just constantly bickering for no discernible reason--despite unemployment having dropped to under 5% for the first time in god knows when, despite enjoying a number of other common indicators of a successful economic climate? Certainly more successful than the economy we have in Canada at the moment.
And yet, watch the news on CNN or MSNBC (but, please, not Fox News) or read it online (but avoid the comments section if you can) and everyone seems angry and miserable. Or at least those talking politics or attending political rallies seem so. It is a self-selecting group, so who can say for sure?
I wouldn't vote for a Republican if all the candidates promised me a non-stop winter weekend in sun-dappled Mexico with my favorite porn star, guilt-free, room service, and all necessary accoutrements on tap. (That would be mid-1990s super Southern stud Sam Crockett, in case anyone wants to know, but I can make other suggestions if he is unavailable.) I think there's a certain segment in the U.S. that's still living with this fantasy of the Rockefeller Republican of long ago--fiscally conservative but socially benign. I'm not sure that manor house baron ever existed, although Dwight Eisenhower is perhaps a better exemplifier than any one of the Rockefellers.
Instead what we seem to have is some time-warped brigade of evangelical Dixiecrat-wannabes, George Wallaces (the white one) without a cause (except the misanthropic, middle-class Caucasian): Race bait, shoot from the lip, and by all means be as mean-spirited as possible when it comes to judging others' behaviors without paying too much attention to your own.
Or you get Donald Trump, whose all of that but without the God. 'Cuz, like, he and God are best friends, and God is amaaaaazing but God's knows he's not nearly as great as Donald Trump . . . .
(Not an actual quote . . . yet.)
Turning to the not-Republicans, aka the Democrats, we have . . . heavy sigh. Hilary Clinton and Bernie Sanders.
I know I'm supposed to like Hilary. In fact, I clearly remember my frenemy Spencer for Let chastising me way back in 2007 for being an on-the-fence Barack Obama supporter. Over dinner, he proceeded to brow-beat me and bad-mouth anyone for their positive spins on Obama's candidacy. Clearly, I did not understand--but desperately needed to!--that Hilary was the far superior candidate.
I don't know if that tipped me over the fence into the Obama ballpark, but it happened soon thereafter. It wouldn't surprise me if that was the defining moment--or at the moment that made me consider more closely my choice--as ol' Spence has done a great job over the years of brow-beating my opinions over various and sundry. (I distinctively remember making a passing remark about enjoying the American/Canadian version of Queer as Folk, an opinion I came to later in the series run, which then provoked an extended lesson on why I was morally wrong to like the show. That ol' Spence. He has a way with humanity.)
At this point, in 2016, I'll concede that Hilary's the most experienced candidate and would have less of a learning curve than any of the other players on the field. Way back in 2007, I think she might have had a few more years of a U.S. Senate career under her belt than Obama, but counting her time as First Lady as being equal to bonafide POTUS experience makes only slightly more sense as Sarah Palin claiming she had foreign policy experience because Alaska is located next door to Russia.
But I could deal with a Hilary presidency. She's not my favorite, but I hardly think she's the horrifying shrewish mother/anti-mother figure that Conservatives imagine in their nightmares. Or dreams. Hey, Conservatives are a freaky bunch.
But I don't think I can deal with another Bill Clinton presidency--and you just know he won't be able to stop himself from inserting into every nookie and granny cranny of Hilary's administration. Everyone seems to remember Bill fondly, at home and abroad, except me. He was a liar and a womanizer back then, I suspect he's the same now (just more discreet), and he'll continue to be so in the afterlife. The thought of him being anywhere near a whore house, let alone the White House, should be cause for alarm.
* * *
And yet I am no fan of Bernie Sanders either, and I'm not sure I really, fully understand why. I mean, policy-wise, we are not in disagreement. I'm all for more affordable education and universal healthcare. (I would ask, "who wouldn't be?" but I'm afraid this would show how far I've fallen from American grace.) I do think Bernie over-imagines his potential effectiveness as POTUS. For pity's sake, people went berserk over Obama's moderate changes. What would they do with an actual, self-professed socialist in the Oval Office?
Then again, Bernie's not black, which has always seemed to me to be the reason that those who have a problem with Obama have a problem with Obama. Maybe the unconventional senator from Vermont can pull it off, but I feel doubtful over both his policies and his background. In 241 years of American history, we've had one moderate Catholic president and one moderate African-American president, and people nearly crapped a cinder block over both. I can only imagine the eruption over a secular Jewish socialist hippie from Vermont talking "revolutionary" politics.
In large part, I think my problem with Sanders is twofold--
The first fold--see above. I really can't see anyone, establishment or hoi polloi, to the right of Eleanor Roosevelt easily digesting a Sanders presidency. Should it even come to pass--and I think that's about as likely as it was for McGovern to have won in 1972.
The second fold (which is manifold--so much so that we're practically on the verge of origami)--I'm exhausted from hearing a certain subset of friends praise Sanders every time he makes up as much as a grocery list. I have a couple of Facebook friends who are relentlessly, slavishly Sanderistas, a-quiver at every statement, pronouncement, or offhand remark made by el Comandante. There is no escaping their zealotry for a guy, who, frankly, I consider passionate and opinionated, but not much else.
I think you have to have more than passion and opinions to be a leader. Otherwise, you're Ron Paul. Or worse, you're Donald Trump.
Some might argue that Obama spawned the same kind of zealotry. I would not, however. Oh, there are people who would blindly follow him to the ends of the earth and the ends of time, no doubt. The difference is that Obama, in my view, is less about the cult and more about being the actual president to everyone, not just those who agree with him.
His handlers and celebrity fans, sure, they're all about the cult. But at the end of the day, I have always thought of Obama as just a decent, incredibly intelligent, and poised man who has tried hard to do the right thing. Not just African Americans. Not just gays. Not just business. Not just liberals. Everyone.
As the saying goes, you can't please everyone. Or sometimes even anyone. And during the Obama age, this has shown itself to be true.
Do I think he's perfect? Have I liked everything he's done? Have I been bothered by things that I didn't think he did well enough. No, no, and yep.
A case in point: I feel that his administration could have done more to address the growing inequality in the U.S. Nonetheless, he's done a lot to be sure, and if he accomplished nothing more for the rest of his life than getting the Affordable Care Act done, then he's a genius and a statesman and deserves our praise and generosity for the ages to come.
I also feel like criticizing him about not doing more to address inequality is a bit unfair. For one, the U.S. Congress, one of our many national shames, actively and unabashedly fought him and undermined him over everything he proposed, large and small. For another, it's not like "let's fix inequality" has been the zeitgeist; rather, most of us were focused on getting back on our own two feet following the Great Recession. We didn't have much time, energy, or interest to think about anyone else's plight. let alone legislating to improve it.
* * *
I've been thinking about Ronald Reagan lately, not something I care to do, honestly. I despised him and I loathe his legacy, but he certainly left us with a mark--a very dark, costly, punishing, simplistic, and selfish one--that continues to color our judgment and cover up our reality. Call it what you will--conservatism, neo-conservatism, the love of "freedom" (especially the free market and laissez-faire economic policy), "making America great again," etc. ad nauseum--it all sounds like bullshit to me. It has left us with a legacy of inequality, one that we can't seem to surmount. And it has left us with a clown's parade of politicos who have had to live up to or live down Reagan's "simple solutions" of low taxes for the rich, no money for social services, trickle down economics, and free reign to markets and evangelicals. Even Bill Clinton continued to follow much of this trajectory, at least when he wasn't schtupping secretaries and lounge singers.
Will Obama leave us with a legacy that is different and fairer than before? I hope so. I don't know if he's been able to make his mark as strongly as Reagan did, but then Reagan had more support, politically and popularly. Advocating selfishness tends to succeed more than advocating respect for humanity.
Obama, on the other hand, has had to deal with the Know-Nothing age of Republican politics and the standard set of weak-willed Democrats. He has succeeded in many ways, despite this, but unfortunately, I don't feel as though he's been able to graft this progressiveness and humanity on the American body politic. Time will tell, and I pray that time will tell me that I'm wrong.
Who would be a likely, worthy successor to Obama? I haven't a clue. Both Hilary and Bernie have their pluses and minuses, and maybe either/or will do a stellar job, should we be so lucky to find ourselves with this option come the fall. Hilary has more baggage than I would prefer. In addition, she seems to have the resolve of a willow tree in a hurricane. By that I mean she is tough and resilient but will bend whichever way the wind blows. For me, she lacks authenticity.
Bernie's got authenticity, but is it an authenticity that we want? His baggage seems to have gotten stuck on a luggage carousel at an airport outside of Woodstock, circa 1969.
A case in point: He recently chose a Simon and Garfunkel song for a campaign ad, which, naturally, the left has gone all verklempt over. All I can say is I hope someone tells him Jerry Garcia's dead before he invites him to serve as Vice President.
Please, for the love of Janis Joplin and Jimi Hendrix, let's not have another American presidential election where we battle out the unresolved issues of the 1960s once again. Heck, I'm in my 50s, and even I'm not that nostalgic.
Oh, I can still vote in the U.S., a fact I seem to have to keep reminding Americans of. I just have a work permit for Canada after all; I didn't have to give up my citizenship to move here.
Nor would I do so, despite recently having begun the process of applying for permanent residency here. I miss the United States. More than I thought I would. It is still home, and I still worry about it. Is it eating alright? Is it getting along with others? Is it happy? Has it killed anyone lately, by accident or on purpose? Or is it just constantly bickering for no discernible reason--despite unemployment having dropped to under 5% for the first time in god knows when, despite enjoying a number of other common indicators of a successful economic climate? Certainly more successful than the economy we have in Canada at the moment.
And yet, watch the news on CNN or MSNBC (but, please, not Fox News) or read it online (but avoid the comments section if you can) and everyone seems angry and miserable. Or at least those talking politics or attending political rallies seem so. It is a self-selecting group, so who can say for sure?
I wouldn't vote for a Republican if all the candidates promised me a non-stop winter weekend in sun-dappled Mexico with my favorite porn star, guilt-free, room service, and all necessary accoutrements on tap. (That would be mid-1990s super Southern stud Sam Crockett, in case anyone wants to know, but I can make other suggestions if he is unavailable.) I think there's a certain segment in the U.S. that's still living with this fantasy of the Rockefeller Republican of long ago--fiscally conservative but socially benign. I'm not sure that manor house baron ever existed, although Dwight Eisenhower is perhaps a better exemplifier than any one of the Rockefellers.
Instead what we seem to have is some time-warped brigade of evangelical Dixiecrat-wannabes, George Wallaces (the white one) without a cause (except the misanthropic, middle-class Caucasian): Race bait, shoot from the lip, and by all means be as mean-spirited as possible when it comes to judging others' behaviors without paying too much attention to your own.
Or you get Donald Trump, whose all of that but without the God. 'Cuz, like, he and God are best friends, and God is amaaaaazing but God's knows he's not nearly as great as Donald Trump . . . .
(Not an actual quote . . . yet.)
Turning to the not-Republicans, aka the Democrats, we have . . . heavy sigh. Hilary Clinton and Bernie Sanders.
I know I'm supposed to like Hilary. In fact, I clearly remember my frenemy Spencer for Let chastising me way back in 2007 for being an on-the-fence Barack Obama supporter. Over dinner, he proceeded to brow-beat me and bad-mouth anyone for their positive spins on Obama's candidacy. Clearly, I did not understand--but desperately needed to!--that Hilary was the far superior candidate.
I don't know if that tipped me over the fence into the Obama ballpark, but it happened soon thereafter. It wouldn't surprise me if that was the defining moment--or at the moment that made me consider more closely my choice--as ol' Spence has done a great job over the years of brow-beating my opinions over various and sundry. (I distinctively remember making a passing remark about enjoying the American/Canadian version of Queer as Folk, an opinion I came to later in the series run, which then provoked an extended lesson on why I was morally wrong to like the show. That ol' Spence. He has a way with humanity.)
At this point, in 2016, I'll concede that Hilary's the most experienced candidate and would have less of a learning curve than any of the other players on the field. Way back in 2007, I think she might have had a few more years of a U.S. Senate career under her belt than Obama, but counting her time as First Lady as being equal to bonafide POTUS experience makes only slightly more sense as Sarah Palin claiming she had foreign policy experience because Alaska is located next door to Russia.
But I could deal with a Hilary presidency. She's not my favorite, but I hardly think she's the horrifying shrewish mother/anti-mother figure that Conservatives imagine in their nightmares. Or dreams. Hey, Conservatives are a freaky bunch.
But I don't think I can deal with another Bill Clinton presidency--and you just know he won't be able to stop himself from inserting into every nook
* * *
And yet I am no fan of Bernie Sanders either, and I'm not sure I really, fully understand why. I mean, policy-wise, we are not in disagreement. I'm all for more affordable education and universal healthcare. (I would ask, "who wouldn't be?" but I'm afraid this would show how far I've fallen from American grace.) I do think Bernie over-imagines his potential effectiveness as POTUS. For pity's sake, people went berserk over Obama's moderate changes. What would they do with an actual, self-professed socialist in the Oval Office?
Then again, Bernie's not black, which has always seemed to me to be the reason that those who have a problem with Obama have a problem with Obama. Maybe the unconventional senator from Vermont can pull it off, but I feel doubtful over both his policies and his background. In 241 years of American history, we've had one moderate Catholic president and one moderate African-American president, and people nearly crapped a cinder block over both. I can only imagine the eruption over a secular Jewish socialist hippie from Vermont talking "revolutionary" politics.
In large part, I think my problem with Sanders is twofold--
The first fold--see above. I really can't see anyone, establishment or hoi polloi, to the right of Eleanor Roosevelt easily digesting a Sanders presidency. Should it even come to pass--and I think that's about as likely as it was for McGovern to have won in 1972.
The second fold (which is manifold--so much so that we're practically on the verge of origami)--I'm exhausted from hearing a certain subset of friends praise Sanders every time he makes up as much as a grocery list. I have a couple of Facebook friends who are relentlessly, slavishly Sanderistas, a-quiver at every statement, pronouncement, or offhand remark made by el Comandante. There is no escaping their zealotry for a guy, who, frankly, I consider passionate and opinionated, but not much else.
I think you have to have more than passion and opinions to be a leader. Otherwise, you're Ron Paul. Or worse, you're Donald Trump.
Some might argue that Obama spawned the same kind of zealotry. I would not, however. Oh, there are people who would blindly follow him to the ends of the earth and the ends of time, no doubt. The difference is that Obama, in my view, is less about the cult and more about being the actual president to everyone, not just those who agree with him.
His handlers and celebrity fans, sure, they're all about the cult. But at the end of the day, I have always thought of Obama as just a decent, incredibly intelligent, and poised man who has tried hard to do the right thing. Not just African Americans. Not just gays. Not just business. Not just liberals. Everyone.
As the saying goes, you can't please everyone. Or sometimes even anyone. And during the Obama age, this has shown itself to be true.
Do I think he's perfect? Have I liked everything he's done? Have I been bothered by things that I didn't think he did well enough. No, no, and yep.
A case in point: I feel that his administration could have done more to address the growing inequality in the U.S. Nonetheless, he's done a lot to be sure, and if he accomplished nothing more for the rest of his life than getting the Affordable Care Act done, then he's a genius and a statesman and deserves our praise and generosity for the ages to come.
I also feel like criticizing him about not doing more to address inequality is a bit unfair. For one, the U.S. Congress, one of our many national shames, actively and unabashedly fought him and undermined him over everything he proposed, large and small. For another, it's not like "let's fix inequality" has been the zeitgeist; rather, most of us were focused on getting back on our own two feet following the Great Recession. We didn't have much time, energy, or interest to think about anyone else's plight. let alone legislating to improve it.
* * *
I've been thinking about Ronald Reagan lately, not something I care to do, honestly. I despised him and I loathe his legacy, but he certainly left us with a mark--a very dark, costly, punishing, simplistic, and selfish one--that continues to color our judgment and cover up our reality. Call it what you will--conservatism, neo-conservatism, the love of "freedom" (especially the free market and laissez-faire economic policy), "making America great again," etc. ad nauseum--it all sounds like bullshit to me. It has left us with a legacy of inequality, one that we can't seem to surmount. And it has left us with a clown's parade of politicos who have had to live up to or live down Reagan's "simple solutions" of low taxes for the rich, no money for social services, trickle down economics, and free reign to markets and evangelicals. Even Bill Clinton continued to follow much of this trajectory, at least when he wasn't schtupping secretaries and lounge singers.
Will Obama leave us with a legacy that is different and fairer than before? I hope so. I don't know if he's been able to make his mark as strongly as Reagan did, but then Reagan had more support, politically and popularly. Advocating selfishness tends to succeed more than advocating respect for humanity.
Obama, on the other hand, has had to deal with the Know-Nothing age of Republican politics and the standard set of weak-willed Democrats. He has succeeded in many ways, despite this, but unfortunately, I don't feel as though he's been able to graft this progressiveness and humanity on the American body politic. Time will tell, and I pray that time will tell me that I'm wrong.
Who would be a likely, worthy successor to Obama? I haven't a clue. Both Hilary and Bernie have their pluses and minuses, and maybe either/or will do a stellar job, should we be so lucky to find ourselves with this option come the fall. Hilary has more baggage than I would prefer. In addition, she seems to have the resolve of a willow tree in a hurricane. By that I mean she is tough and resilient but will bend whichever way the wind blows. For me, she lacks authenticity.
Bernie's got authenticity, but is it an authenticity that we want? His baggage seems to have gotten stuck on a luggage carousel at an airport outside of Woodstock, circa 1969.
A case in point: He recently chose a Simon and Garfunkel song for a campaign ad, which, naturally, the left has gone all verklempt over. All I can say is I hope someone tells him Jerry Garcia's dead before he invites him to serve as Vice President.
Please, for the love of Janis Joplin and Jimi Hendrix, let's not have another American presidential election where we battle out the unresolved issues of the 1960s once again. Heck, I'm in my 50s, and even I'm not that nostalgic.
Tuesday, February 02, 2016
The Dead Rodent Society
| From the Weather Network Canada, 29 January 2016. See the full article here. |
Sometimes even I don't have the words.
Although when I posted this to Facebook recently, many a friend did have the words.
My favorite was, "So how's that socialized medicine working for you now, rodent?!" from my friend B.I.
Nonetheless, there were other pithy remarks about how at least in Pennsylvania they knew enough to have a "strategic groundhog reserve" of three or more of the buggers in case Punxsutawney Phil decided to make a break for that great pile of chucked wood in the sky at an inopportune moment.
I could draw some unfavorable comparison between Canadian and American understandings of show business, but let's be charitable on this
We are all weeping and woeful for Winnipeg Willow.
Woah.
Monday, January 18, 2016
Not Encino, not Portofino, but Ocho Rios
When the weather turns cold in Toronto, we all think about flying down Ocho Rios way . . . .
Thank you to the late, great Paul Jabara for your body of work. We just didn't appreciate you enough when you were here among us. I hope in the afterlife you're making "Heaven is a Disco" a dream come true.
Sunday, January 17, 2016
Showing the '70s some love
And Party Every Day: The Inside Story of Casablanca Records by Larry HarrisMy rating: 5 of 5 stars
I enjoyed this book far more than I probably should have. While it's not perfectly written, it is very entertaining, especially for me, someone who remembers well the rise and fall of Casablanca Records, the Kiss era, Donna Summer, disco, Parliament/Funkadelic, and everything else that Neil Bogart, Larry Harris, et al., begat and bequeathed.
Not all of it was good, but when it was good, it was great, as much for the music as for the fantasy, glamour, and excess it created.
The focus in this book is perhaps more on Kiss than on the others. As more of a disco dolly, I would have preferred more about Donna Summer and Giorgio Moroder. Nonetheless, Harris does a good job of conveying some of what was going on with them and their music at the time. He also touches upon the rise of gay culture in the disco era, not shying away from it, although again, I was left wanting more.
That's not really a criticism. I'm just greedy.
While not a Kiss fan and knowing only a little about George Clinton and Parliament, I was nonetheless enthralled to read about their personalities, work, and vision, and how Casablanca hustled to unleash them on a receptive, if unsuspecting, public.
I was a teenager during this era, a time in my mind's eye, when America was still on the move, when the angst and anger of the late '60s had somewhat subsided and the conservatism and consumerism of the '80s had not taken over. So there's a special place in my heart for the people, places, and events described within. People often say the '70s were about nothing, but I think they were about a number of things: harmony, unity, diversity, fun, working out our past social kinks and moving on to a better, more liberated culture. An idealized take on the decade? Perhaps, but I'd match it any day to the accomplishments of the '80s.
Having said that, from some of the events described in these pages, I'm not sure I would have survived if I'd been on that '70s scene. In fact, many didn't. Drugs, decadence, and disease took their toll.
Thus it's great to have Harris's stories about Paul Jabara, Marc Paul Simon, Jacques Morali, Henri Belolo, Casablanca FilmWorks, Donna Summer, George Clinton, the four Kiss solo albums, radio promotion, marketing music, and all the rest. It's a terrific chronicle of a lost time and place and a loving but honest look at the genius and the folly that was Neil Bogart.
View all my reviews
Monday, January 11, 2016
Full of sound and vision, but not much else
Because I've got a head cold and I'm in a cranky mood, let me launch the first counter-offensive in the War on Feet of Clay.
With the sudden death of David Bowie, it's going to be a long day on social media, especially for those of us who never quite "got" him--or perhaps got him only too well. Twitter's the worst of it right now with people I follow making comments like, "I never cried this much when my father died." And then there's Facebook where one "friend" took only about five seconds to bring in the passing of his friend and my former boyfriend Cali two years ago into the mix of misplaced grief.
Not meaning to be cold, but everything comes back to Cali for this guy.
(I should really get back to telling you more about Cali one of these days, shouldn't I? Despite the passing of a couple of years, it's still highly relevant. Even on good days, I often weigh in my mind whether he was cruel to be kind or just plain cruel, a mean-spirited spectre in my life that I still find hanging over me, ready to swoop down on my heart and my mind and pick them to pieces. Just imagine the bad days.)
Please do give me a fudge-ripple break. I will admit to having cried some when a favorite musician died, often because I felt they were under-appreciated or misunderstood during his or her lifetime, or because they were simply gone too soon, in my mind at least. Ditto for when a favorite show has ended or been axed. A world of emotion, comfort, and inspiration is lost. I mean, the tears I spent over Betty's fate at the end of Mad Men was quite ridiculous and embarrassing. In a bad Hitchcock ripoff kind of way, I think she was unjustly punished for not being the ideal that she represented, for figuring out her life and her inner self "too late." Meanwhile, ol' Dirty Dapper Don Draper has panic attacks, a major meltdown, and then gets an epiphany--about how to market Coca Cola.
Pop pop fizz fizz.
But even though I thought Betty got the rawest of deals, I didn't stop on the street and share my special feelings with everyone I met.
Intellectually, I can understand how someone might feel all verklempt about David Bowie and his oeuvre. And this certainly doesn't mean you, dear Reader, shouldn't like David Bowie or fail to recognize his impact on your life, and share that to some degree with those around you. But perspective, please: Let's not go overboard and pay him more due or attach more import to him than to the passing of your father or mother or anyone that you actually know.
I don't happen to feel this pain that the world is experiencing at the moment. I can assure you that I never cried as much over anything or anyone than when my father died, a pain that still can bring me to tears nearly nine years later. I can also think of one pet that died too young that can also make me sad from time to time.
But pardonnez-moi if'n I don't join in the mass rending of garments, the collective wailing of "Why?!" at the tomb of the alleged idol that is
Whether rightly or wrongly, I lost interest in David Bowie during the "China Girl" era. I heard "Just you shut your mouth" one too many times and then Bowie went and said in Rolling Stone, "I was never really bisexual," or words to that effect. And that, at the beginning of the AIDS crisis, at the onset of the backlash against gay people that has only just subsided in the last few years in the U.S., was when many of us desperately needed to hear someone be encouraging and positive about our sexuality and our difference.
But no. Instead we probably got the truth, not the one that we wanted, but the one that had been out there all along: That DB was not gay nor bisexual. That a decade before Bowie had claimed he was bisexual because . . . he was an agent provocateur and needed to stand out in the Glam era? Wanted to make a cultural fashion statement? He wanted to sell some records in the more open-to-the-dandy climate of merry ol' England?
Let me take you back to 1983 when the M in MTV was in full flower and the bloom was fast coming off the raggedly, jaggedly rose of what seemed to be an honest, edgy, alternative awakening. That brief moment in our lives from, say, 1977 to 1982 or so (or possibly even just 1980 to 1982 if I'm feeling particularly pedantic) was quickly turned into a 30-second commercial, advertising Modern Love and deep pore cleansers, accompanied by a soundtrack of slap bass and a landscape of quiffy hair. And there was Bowie riding the Honda Scooter into Reagan- and Thatcher-era consumerism/conservatism along with everyone else, in that Rolling Stone article talking about the love for his child, what it was like being a father, blah-di-freakin'-blah.
So at that point the Thin White Duke became the Thin White Sell-Out for me. More interested in being on trend and clearing up any lingering confusion for the benefit of selling more records in the American market.
Maybe I'm not remembering the text exactly, although a quick perusal of Wikipedia highlighted for me what I recalled best from the article.
What I do remember clearly and freshly is being massively disappointed. I hadn't been out that long, only three years at that point, and despite my protestations otherwise, it would have helped to have someone so high profile not push away the "taint" of alternative sexuality and be supportive and proud of who he was--if indeed he was that person.
And if he wasn't that person, why claim to be otherwise in the first place? To be an agent provocateur? To stand out more than others in the Glam era? To seem edgy or cool? To sell more records in the dandy-friendly climate of merry ol' England?
Oh dear. I'm running the risk of being as it's-all-about-me as the rest of Facebookdom and the Twitterverse. David Bowie wasn't responsible for my happiness and self-worth. I know this, but still . . . the rejection . . . it burns.
Chameleons are interesting and pretty to look at, but you can't really rely on them to show their true colors. Instead, I prefer having something real to hang onto to, to believe in, to remember, to give thanks to, as I take the time to enjoy and experience the people, places, and things I encounter on Life's Great Road Trip.
* * *
Having said all this, I will go on record to proclaim that I like to adore "Fame," "Fashion," "Sound and Vision," "Heroes" (including Ewan MacGregor singing some verses of it in Moulin Rouge), "Golden Years," "TVC15," "Suffragette City," "Young Americans," and all the stuff before "Let's Dance." Those were some fantastic records. If he'd only made one or two of those, like "Golden Years" and "Changes," he'd be worthy of a very high level of pop cultural praise.
I'll even admit to liking "Let's Dance" and "China Girl" in the first 4,999 or so listens. But then you can rarely go wrong with Nile Rodgers at the control board. I think he deserves as much credit for his sound, minus vision, at that point in time. And Bowie deserves credit for his vision at that time, to pick someone who would become one of the hottest collaborators and producers of that era as well as today.
I also love this, "Little Drummer Boy/Peace on Earth," the bizarre collaboration between Bing Crosby and the Bowie from the late 1970s. Nevertheless, I have to wonder if this should have been our first clue about the chameleon-like (read: sell-out) nature of David Bowie.
I've had British friends howl with laughter and derision over our fake American Christmas specials, and then there's ol' Davy, right in the holly-and-ivy thick of it, with Mister Wonder Bread Christmas himself, pretending to be a clueless father from down the street who happens to stumble in wanting to use a friend's piano and ends up singing a (brilliant, wonderful, and timeless) duet with the Bingster.
Just add Andy Williams and some fake snow, and this mortal is ready to uncoil and viper attack the next person who starts emoting over the loss of a legend.
Obviously, I can cuddle and play footsie with a grudge for a very long time. Thank you for the music and the creative imagery, David Bowie. You did make some great music and were obviously more influential to some, to many, than I ever realized. Rest in peace and all that jazz.
But if you don't mind, I'm gonna sit out this global interpretive dance of tribute and tribulation in your honor. I don't doubt that for some your death has great meaning, but for me, you'll always be that pop star who followed the zeitgeist and never looked back.
Sunday, January 10, 2016
No puede ser
| Screen grab from the CBC World News webpage, 10 January 2016. |
Thank you! I'm here all week!
Sunday, January 03, 2016
Pink Cadillac
I always loved Natalie Cole's version of Bruce Springsteen's "Pink Cadillac." Having said that, this video is so 1980s it makes my scrunchy hurt.
Rest in peace, Miss Natalie.
Saturday, January 02, 2016
Thursday, December 24, 2015
Snow Day
Wherever you may be, whatever the weather is like, however you celebrate (or do not), season's greetings from me to you.
Monday, December 21, 2015
And the winner is . . .
![]() |
| Steve Harvey at a ceremony to receive a star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame. By Angela George, 13 May 2013. License: CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported. |
Just imagine! We would be living in a totally different world right now. I'd like to think we'd be war-free since whenever, that 9/11 never happened, that perhaps Taylor Swift and the Kardashians had never been visited upon us.
Taylor would be teaching pre-school somewhere in Pennsylvania. Kim K. would be an aging stripper down on her luck in Las Vegas.
But I'm a realist at heart.
Bad crap always happens whether you want it to or not. The key is to mitigate it as much as possible--and to not actively add to the crap fiasco you're enduring. Yes, I'm talking to you, the George "Dubya" Bush administration from 2000 to 2008.
Nevertheless, it's lovely to have a dream or two stored away, just in case you ever have the opportunity to vigorously rub a genie's bottle, are granted three wishes, and don't screw up said wishes. Then you can ask for the privilege of traveling back in time to help every Florida man and woman, not to mention the U.S. Supreme Court, make the right call and change history as we know it.
![]() |
| Early bearded hipster trendsetter, Rutherford B. Hayes Public Domain. |
* * *
Another plus to giving Steve Harvey that kind of power--Pornstar mustaches would be cool again, not beards that make every guy look like a young, swagger-delic Rutherford B. Hayes.
Steve Harvey for Time-Traveling Emcee in 2016!
Sunday, December 20, 2015
The songs of shortwave, volume 1
Author's note: I updated this mixtape on 1 January 2016 (Happy New Year!). This is volume 1; volume 2 is forthcoming--hopefully no later than later this month. Enjoy!
* * *
Happy early holidays--at least if receiving a new mixtape/podcast from me is a fun gift in your mind. I hope it is because it's all I've got for you this year. Perhaps, ahem.
My gift to you is all about me, of course! Ha, well, kinda. It's another in a series of my explorations into my childhood, into what made me tick then and continues to make me tick now, decades later.
I was a huge aficionado of international broadcasting on shortwave radio back in the day, and I still think about buying a new radio--the kind of set, a tabletop or a highly sensitive portable, that I couldn't afford when I was younger. After all, I live in a new part of the globe, and there are no power lines in our neighbo(u)rhood. (Everything's buried so as to prevent snapping during extreme cold and icestorms, and I suspect to soothe suburban aesthetic sensitivities as well.) Just imagine what I might hear again or for the first time from our near neighbors--Iceland! Greenland! Saint Pierre et Miquelon!
Or maybe I would hear from some place completely different--Indonesia, Thailand, Kenya, Cote D'Ivoire--all those places I wanted to tune in so long ago but could never quite pull in on my static-friendly portable in rural North Carolina.
This is not to say that I was a slouch as a DX-er (aka, long-distance listener). I remember staying up until the early hours to hear the opening of the broadcast day in Togo and Cameroon. I remember going to bed listening to Latin rhythms emanating from stations in Brazil, Colombia, and Venezuela--and have the QSL cards to prove it. I remember hearing Iceland, the Philippines, Bangladesh, Tahiti, Tashkent, Morocco, and hundreds of others, near and far.
My favorites? In no particular order--the Voice of Turkey (for the music), Radio Australia, Brussels Calling, Radio France International, Radio Sweden, Radio Exterior de España/Spanish Foreign Radio, Radio Austria International, Deutsche Welle, Radio Nederland, Radio RSA: The Voice of South Africa (I know, I know . . .), and, naturally enough, Radio Canada International.
A European bias perhaps, but these were often the best, most consistently received stations where I lived at the time.
Which came first--My interest in the world outside of where I lived or my enthusiasm for shortwave, which led to an interest in the world elsewhere? I would say the former. I mean, how many kids were in the second grade trying to borrow books on Sweden from their small-town public library? Not many, at least not in North Carolina in the 1960s and '70s. Some days I truly feel for my parents. What a bafflement I must have put them through with the constant arrival of letters and packets of information from the Soviet Union, Germany, Japan, South Africa, and Australia.
I still yearn for those days of uncomplicated childhood, when my only "responsibility" was to listen to shortwave, learn about different cultures and perspectives, write some letters to radio stations (or penpals), and receive mail from all over the world.
Those days are mostly gone, I fear. Who writes letters anymore? I can barely send out Christmas cards. I still listen and watch international broadcasting, but it's all internet-based, whether on my computer, my phone, my Kindle, or my Roku.
Now at least I can hear the content without squelch and static, the jamming and knob-twiddling, but the serendipity, the happenstance, the fun, are somewhat lacking. Where's the challenge if all you have to do is go to a URL, an app, or a channel? Tuning in--figuring out the frequency, realizing the time difference, setting the dial just right, and hoping against hope that some other undesired station didn't bleed into the broadcast you wanted to hear--was an adventure.
So this mix and the previous podcast I did are ways for me to hark back to that time but also to celebrate its positive influence on my life. I might never had ventured out of North Carolina and moved to Texas, let alone Canada, without my shortwave radio. I might never have been open to meeting and falling in love with a truly lovely man from Egypt. I might never have learned about music--and international communism!
* * *
Now about these tunes . . .
In most cases, I think they speak for themselves, that is to say, there is a clear connection between the signature tune and the song played. In other cases, not so much. So below you'll find an annotated playlist in which I try to explain myself and where my mind was when I made my choices.
Comrades, let the Revolution begin! Forward left to volume 2, coming soon to a MixCloud near you.1) "Oranges and Lemons - the Bells of St. Clement's" and 2) the BBC Caribbean relay station version of "Oranges and Lemons."This is immediately followed by 3) the tonal "B-B-C" interval signal, enchanting and slightly haunting, mixed with 4) the BBC "V" interval signal, mixed with 5) the BBC World Service bells.
Radio RSA QSL card. Author's collection. 6) A version of "Lillibulero" was (and maybe still is) featured at the top of the hour of most BBC World Service broadcasts.7) "London Calling" by the Clash: Again, another popular song that seems inspired by the world of international broadcasting. I first heard the Clash on the BBC World Service Top 20 or A Jolly Good Show, can't remember which now.8) Radio RSA: The Voice of South Africa - interval signal and announcement: My favorite signature tune and possibly the most beautiful one ever created. For a moment put aside the racist Apartheid regime that created the tune to lure you in. It is still a gorgeous melody played simply and lushly. It's probably single-handedly responsible for my life-long fascination with Afrikaans and Afrikaner South Africa. (Other connections: Dutch colonial expansion led directly to the unique culture and grinding problems of contemporary South Africa.)9) Toni & Jan: A modern interpretation of the folk tune, "Ver in die Wereld, Kittie," upon which the signature tune is based. It doesn't compare all that favorably to the original in my mind. Thus I'd love to hear remake played as slowly and sparingly as the original interval signal.10) and 11): Two versions of "Nkosi Sikelel' iAfrika" ("God Bless Africa"), the new, post-Apartheid national anthem of South Africa. 10) is by the Mahotella Queens and 11) by Beston Barnett.12) Radio-Télévision Guinéenne interval signal and opening: If I'm going to celebrate Afrikaner culture, I'm going to have to balance things out by celebrating post-colonial African culture as well. Guinea--home at one point to Pan-Africanist revolutionary Stokely Carmichael and performer, activist, and South African ex-pat, Miriam Makeba.13) "Alpha Yaya" by Bako Dagnon: I don't know the history of this song, other than it's considered a "heroic" song and may or may not be sort of a Guinean, post-colonial African anthem. It seems like a good balance to anything inspired by Radio RSA.14) Interval signal and announcement for the general overseas service of All India Radio. A broadcaster I was only able to listen to sporadically over the years, but one with a mystical, unmistakable interval signal.15) Dissidenten - "All India Radio": Not a song from that era--I don't even remember how I first heard about Dissidenten--but part of my interest in exploring (the world, world music) I suspect. The title makes it seem as though I wasn't alone in being fascinated by foreign radio broadcasts.
Radio Japan QSL card. Author's collection. 16) Interval signal for Radio Japan, 17) "Kazoe Uta," and 18) "Sakura, Sakura": Apparently, Radio Japan used "Kazoe Uta," described as a Japanese children's counting song, as the interval signal for its international broadcasts, but it also used "Sakura, Sakura" ("Cherry Blossoms") for others. I have no idea which this is, and I have no clear sense of whether the "Kazoe Uta" and "Sakura, Sakura" selected are matches to the signature tune. Nevertheless, it's an attempt to pay homage to the beauty and significance of Japanese culture. I never listened much to the Radio Beijing or Radio China International, so I have nothing to offer from there in this mix. Maybe in volume 2 . . . .19) Radio Australia interval signal and the laughing kookaburra, along with 20) "Waltzing Matilda" by the Seekers: Again, here's another case where I find the interval signal more enjoyable than the folk tune upon which it is based. Oh well.21) The interval signal for l'Office de Radiodiffusion-Télévision Française (ORTF) in Tahiti, unforgettable with its South Pacific rapid-fire drumming, one I often heard in the evening in North America.22) The bird-chirping interval signal and opening anthem of Radio New Zealand.Moving on to the Nordic world, I offer in rapid succession the following: The haunting interval signal for 23) Radio Norway, followed by the one for 24) YLE Radio Finland. That is followed by the interval signal for 25) Rikisutvarpid, the national broadcaster of Iceland, with 26) Radio Denmark up next. And that is followed by 27) Radio Greenland, a station that I think I heard once or twice way back in the day but one that I was never able to clearly identify.28) Radio Sweden interval signal and opening: The "classic" broadcast opening featuring notes from the song, "Storm och böljar tystna ren . . . ," and Hugo Alfvén's "Swedish Rhapsody."
Radio Sweden QSL card. Author's collection. 29) A longer, instrumental version of "Storm och böljar" performed by Tomas Blank and the Göteborgs Symfonietta, followed by 30) Ralph Lundsten's "Out in the Wide World," the song that eventually replaced the classic Radio Sweden interval signal and broadcast opening. I like it, quite a lot actually, but I still prefer the 1970s version.Is Canada a Nordic station? Some would say yes, but then we might have to examine what is meant by the term "Nordic." For the purposes of this mixtape, I'm lumping 31) Radio Canada International's interval signal, the first four notes of "O, Canada," with the other Nordic national and international broadcasters. This is where my intense like affair with Canada didn't so much begin but was greatly encouraged and strengthened. (My stamp collection and the GAF Viewmaster slides of Canada I received as a birthday gift are also to blame for my Canada crush.)32) "Vive la Canadienne" and 33) "Les Montréalais": Two songs that were featured in Radio Canada International's broadcasts in the 1970s. This exact recording of "Vive la Canadienne" was used to open the broadcast, while this exact recording of "Les Montréalais" was used as part of the closing. Where my love affair with Montréal all began.Next we transition to the Benelux countries (minus the 'Lux): 34), 35), 36), and 37) are various interval signals from various versions of Radiodiffusion-Télévision Belge (RTB) and Belgische Radio en Televisie (BRT), the French and Dutch broadcasters, respectively, of bilingual Belgium.BRT often used versions of the Dutch folk song, 38) "Kwezelken" for it's interval signals. You can clearly hear this in 37) but also in 35) if you pay close attention. Meanwhile, RTB used versions of the song 39) "Où peut-on être mieux . . . ?" for its interval signal. Why can't we all just get along?40) Radio Netherlands - interval signal and opening: One of the first international broadcasters I ever listened to. The interval signal and opening are far more stilted than the broadcasts that used to and still emanate from Hilversum.41) Ben van Bergen and the Voices Inside My Head: A modern interpretation of "Merck Toch Hoe Sterck," the Radio Netherlands signature tune.42) Voice of Spain interval signal and opening: I always think of this as Radio Exterior de España or the awkwardly named Spanish Foreign Radio. "Radio Spain International" never seemed to be a workable option.
REE pennant. Author's collection. 43) The Spotnicks - "Spanish Gypsy Dance": A popular version of "España cañi" or "Gypsy Spain," a paso doble composed by Pascual Marquina Narro, a piece of music that always makes one think of Spain. (I might also suggest anything by Miles Davis's Sketches of Spain LP.)44) Interval signal for RAE, Radiodifusión Argentina al Exterior: An incredibly long opening. Apparently the interval signal features the first few notes of "Mi Buenos Aires querido," although I struggle a bit to hear it.Next up, two versions of "Mi Buenos Aires querido," 45) by Daniel Barenboim, Rodolfo Mederos, and Héctor Console and 46) a piece of chill wallpaper by La Fonda Tango Club. The original is by famed Argentine tango composer, Carlos Gardel. My Gardel CDs are still locked in a storage bin in Pittsburgh (no, really), so we'll have to "make do" with these contemporary versions.And to round everything out (with a hint of what's to come in volume 2), I conclude the mixtape with 47) Radio Havana Cuba's interval signal and opening, plus 48) the Red Army Choir performing "La marcha del 26 de julio." Radio Havana's interval signal features the opening notes of this march.
Wednesday, December 09, 2015
¡Ølé!
It's just the holidays as usual in our casita in the Toronto suburbs.
Have yourself a merry little Christmas, all--and just try not to think about what an unrepentant quisling Sonja Henie apparently was. Why spoil all our good cheer with the blunt-force trauma of that reality?
¡Olé!
Tuesday, December 08, 2015
Saturday, November 28, 2015
Mo' money, mo' proverbs
![]() |
| "Ben Carson by Gage Skidmore 7" by Gage Skidmore. Licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0 via Commons. |
It's like the mo' money we come across/
The mo' problems we see/"
* * *
Or "poverbs" as the case may be.
I'm trying to be a good human and not infringe someone else's copyright, so please understand when I insist that you follow this link.
And where does this link take one? To The Guardian's recent photo essay, "Ben Carson's House: A Homage to Himself in Pictures."
Goodness knows, there is so much I could say about Dr. Carson, the least damning being that apparently it is indeed brain surgery, that is to say, everything including brain surgery must be pretty darned simple if the presumably Xanax-addled Dr. Carson can do it.
I write this--and the rather cheeky post title--at my peril. I do not want to ever be seen as criticizing Ben Carson in a way that could be perceived as racist--and the post title is admittedly pushing the very vanilla envelope. (Editor's note: Yes, I know it's manila.) But good lordy, Ben Carson's stupidity transcends race, gender, faith, sexuality, culture, income, and a squillion other potential ways to be bigoted.
I could go on for days about his, Donald Trump's, or any other Republican candidate for president's suitability for office. But let's just simply say that they are not suitable, are in fact embarrassingly ignorant, and yet are "intelligent" enough to be able to push their fellow ignorati and illiterati's Velcro snaps to a frighteningly intolerant and reactionary level.
And yet . . . I just can't muster the energy to rail and rage on about any of them. These whores are simply not worth the attention they're demanding and receiving. While they need to be watched carefully, they do not need to be taken as seriously as they take themselves, that they have anything serious or worthy to contribute to humanity.
Admittedly, I live in Canada now, and I give slightly less of a fig about life in the U.S. than I used to. Oh, I feel the stings of the slings and arrows of stupidity launched by certain culture warriors and their goosesteppin' citizen soldiers. And I worry, worry, worry about my family and friends back home, who deserve so much better, as do most Americans. (Truly.) In a perfect world, I'd be living in the U.S. (but not in Pittsburgh, please, God, never again . . .), enjoying life and work as best as one can until retirement.
But here in Canada I have a lovely boyfriend, I get paid more, I have been able to progress in my career, and I don't worry so much about getting assassinated by loose-cannon, gun-crazy white guys anytime I enter a movie theater, restaurant, or office building.
From here I can appreciate the positives about living in the U.S., of which there are many--a rich culture, a gregarious approach to life, and far better shopping being the ones that come to mind at the moment.
Safety and income equality are not two of its better qualities, unfortunately.
So for now I'm staying put, wishing others well, keeping my citizenship so that I can vote in the next election, and praying (yes, literally) that the Ben Carsons and the Donald Trumps become infected by a raging case of humility and never fully recover.
* * *
All rise for the National Anthem.
A bit about my thinking behind the title of this post: Yes, of course, it refers to "Mo' Money, Mo' Problems" by the late Notorious B.I.G., one of the better songs to come out of the 1990s, in my humble opining, of which there were few, in my humble opinion Part Duh.
The post title also alludes to a situation when you have too much money and not enough class, talent, humility, or self-knowledge to know how to behave.
The case in point: Dr. Ben Carson and his house of horrid decor, perhaps best exemplified by Example A) a quote from "Poverbs" chiseled into a marble wall and Example B) a "selfie" of Ben with freakin' Jesus.
What, God was too busy that day to allow Leonardo Da Vinci to paint him with Ben? A missed opportunity for another lesson in ironic humility, that.
Monday, November 09, 2015
In the morning
Canada's own The Good Lovelies with "In the Morning."
Happy Monday, universe.
Sunday, November 08, 2015
Literally golden hominy
Don't let my mild-to-moderate sarcasm deceive you: I enjoy living in Canada. However, it's perhaps taken me until recently to begin to acclimate to this midlife adventure I'm now 4+ months into.
That's not to say anything against Canada or Canadians. I expected more animosity toward my Americanness and wondered if I'd be perceived as taking a good job away from a hard-working Canadian. Something that you might hear someone (usually an idiot politician and his or her know-nothing followers) say back home. But so far, so very good. People are generally friendly here, even in a big city like Toronto, although I wouldn't say uniformly polite, as the stereotype goes. All bets are off on the daily commute, which can be fierce. I don't know that I've made any friends outside of home, but I feel like I could if I wanted to. I just have to find the time and get myself more organized to do so.
And there has been a lot to organize and take care of since I arrived here on Canada Day, July 1, 2015. The commute. The job. Home life with my boyfriend/partner/significant other/whatever the term may be when you read this in five years' time. Paperwork and lots of it: The work permit (golden ticket número un), my SIN (social insurance number), pension forms, a Presto card, chequing (yes, chequing) and savings accounts, credit cards, a cellphone plan, a Magic Jack plan just in case anyone from the States ever wants to call me; an Ontario driver's license, car insurance, car inspections and registration (something I'm still not done with), passport renewal, and golden ticket número deux, the coveted Ontario Health Insurance Plan (OHIP) identification card, aka free health care.
All while spending 11 to 12 hours a day going to, at, or coming from work, in a country that despite the big spaces and great distances, still operates small: Most business happens 9 to 5, Monday through Friday. Things like insurance agencies are closed in the evenings and on weekends, although banks to their credit do a great job of being open almost all day on Saturdays. And, goodness, they take holidays seriously and give most everyone, even salespeople the day off. Many stores and some malls were closed on Labour (yes, Labour) Day, for instance.
I've managed most of it, except for car inspection and registration, which I hope to accomplish this month. Then I get to do a sort of system reboot in the new year, when I apply for permanent residency, which will ultimately mean different paperwork to complete. But first things first: I have to pass an English-language competency test in order to apply for permanent residency. And it will only cost me the bargain price of $265 CAD to do so.
Obviously the credentials from two American universities, the same that I had to present in order to get my work permit, mean next to nothing in terms of my functionaly literacy in my mother tongue.
The Catch 22 of Canadian bureaucracy aside, there are minor struggles. Spelling and language usage continue to confuse me, so maybe an English test is in order after all. Canadian English is like listening to an old familiar tune that suddenly strikes a . . . let's say "different" rather than "wrong" or "sour" note. It's bi-ling-ew-ul" and "proh-cess" and "proh-ject" and "ah-gainst" and "ree-zource," sometimes all in the same sentence. I'm gradually losing the sense of not so much what constitutes an American spelling but what is a Canadian versus a British versus an American spelling. At the moment I consider myself very much an American living in Canada, not a wannabe Canadian, as I might have desired 10 years ago. But I try to get along, so I'm gradually inserting some extra u's and -re's into every other word, whether they require it or not.
I'm having trouble with my tongue in more ways than one: Continuing to represent challenges are shopping and eating, two of my favorite pastimes.
In a previous post, I discussed the disconnect of shopping in Canada: How Wal-Mart is more like Target and thus not such a shameful experience as it is in the U.S. A couple of months later, and I find myself still confused. Holt Renfrew and Ogilvy are still too high-end for me, and in Toronto, Nordstrom and Saks are about to enter the market, making me outclassed in two countries and cultures. Simon is still planning to move into the TO market from Montreal, which would have been welcome six years ago when I could fit into their men's wear.
Speaking of shamefulness, I kinda miss Marshall's/Ross/T.J. Maxx, and I definitely miss DSW Shoe Warehouse, which I could use right about now, as fall sets in, and I long for a pair of half-boots to protect my tootsies from the rain. I've yet to bring myself to enter a Winners. That's just so wrong.
It's not just the stores and the schedules, though; the products are different, too. Let's start with the most important meal of the day, coffee: Peet's Coffee, my go-to brand in the States is so far, nonexistent. Ditto for Chobani Yogurt. The cereal aisle at the local supermarket is decidedly smaller, although I've managed to find overpriced Bran Buds and reasonably priced Quaker Oat Squares, along with a lot of the Kashi cereals. But then there are cereals like Vector by Kellogg's that sounds like something that would cause bodily harm if poured into the bowl the wrong way.
Despite the prevalence of a highly diverse population, even (or especially) in the suburbs, I have tried three supermarkets and come up anchovy-less--although if you need multi-flavored sardines, conger eel, or octopus in a can, I'm your man. Perhaps I'm misremembering this, but anchovies seemed pretty much a supermarket staple in the States. I'm not saying everybody or anybody much eats them, but you can find them at least. The Caesar salad situation in this nation is at crisis level, as you might imagine.
Southern food, Texas foods, and Mexican foods are also in very short supply, and even when you find them, you often end up with a brand you've never heard of or not exactly the product you're used to.
Grits, white corn? Check, finally found some at the local Loblaws, one variety by a firm named Ferma, a purveyor of Portuguese fine foods based in Montreal, tucked away in an odd amalgam of Asian, Indian, and Latin American foods. Hominy, golden? No, sorry, how about white corn hominy instead? Yes, that will do for pozole, which I'm making for dinner tonight (although experimenting by using chicken instead of pork, given the boyfriend's background). I could only find Goya brand, which I'm familiar with from my days in Texas, but none by any of the more Southern food purveyors that form my cultural strong suit.
Chipotle peppers in adobo sauce? Yes, but barely, intermingled with the red and green chile sauces, courtesy of La Costeña brand, another one I'm less certain of. Hatch green chiles from New Mexico? Well, yes, but only because I stocked up on them via Amazon before I left home. They've come in handy more than once, including for some impromptu Canada Votes election night nachos this past October 19.
None of this is bad, mind you, nor a deal-breaker nor any real hardship, of course. I'm starting to appreciate the prevalence of Lavazza coffee, both ground and whole bean, in the supermarket, and I'm starting to think the whole Chobani thing is one big, $1.50 per container scam. We have a brand of Greek yogurt in Canada, Skotidakis, that actually tastes and mouth-feels (if I must) like Greek yogurt--tart, thick, substantive--to which you can add honey or jam à la Fage. And if you don't like Greek active, then how about French passive in the form of Quebec's own Liberté brand? It's quite and quietly excellent.
Truth be told, I was troubled by the lack of access to grits, however, as well as hominy. Not that I ate either every day back home, but I knew I could get them when I wanted them, even in Pittsburgh. And then suddenly I could not.
And no matter how grim and horrid the Mexican food offerings were in Pittsburgh (and they were scandalously caca-esque), I knew I could find the good stuff somewhere, by visiting a Mexican store, asking for CARE packages from friends in Texas, or shopping on Amazon. While we have our very own Amazon.ca, import levies can jack up the prices for even the most mundane of purchases. Some cases in point: a 7-ounce can of chipotle peppers in Adobo from Goya is currently selling for $40 CAD (although I'm really hoping I've read that wrong, and there's a 12-pack or a case in the offing); Allen's golden hominy does come in pack of 12 but will cost you about $5 CAD per can; a 24-ounce container of Quaker 5-minute grits is currently listed on Amazon à la canadienne for $24.15 CAD, taxes and shipping not included; a 5-pound bag of Quaker Quick Grits sells for a staggering $146.52!
Forget gold, oil, and diamonds--clearly grit manufacturing should be the driver of Canada's economic engine. Golden hominy and hominy-related products are indeed just that--pure gold.
That's not to say anything against Canada or Canadians. I expected more animosity toward my Americanness and wondered if I'd be perceived as taking a good job away from a hard-working Canadian. Something that you might hear someone (usually an idiot politician and his or her know-nothing followers) say back home. But so far, so very good. People are generally friendly here, even in a big city like Toronto, although I wouldn't say uniformly polite, as the stereotype goes. All bets are off on the daily commute, which can be fierce. I don't know that I've made any friends outside of home, but I feel like I could if I wanted to. I just have to find the time and get myself more organized to do so.
And there has been a lot to organize and take care of since I arrived here on Canada Day, July 1, 2015. The commute. The job. Home life with my boyfriend/partner/significant other/whatever the term may be when you read this in five years' time. Paperwork and lots of it: The work permit (golden ticket número un), my SIN (social insurance number), pension forms, a Presto card, chequing (yes, chequing) and savings accounts, credit cards, a cellphone plan, a Magic Jack plan just in case anyone from the States ever wants to call me; an Ontario driver's license, car insurance, car inspections and registration (something I'm still not done with), passport renewal, and golden ticket número deux, the coveted Ontario Health Insurance Plan (OHIP) identification card, aka free health care.
All while spending 11 to 12 hours a day going to, at, or coming from work, in a country that despite the big spaces and great distances, still operates small: Most business happens 9 to 5, Monday through Friday. Things like insurance agencies are closed in the evenings and on weekends, although banks to their credit do a great job of being open almost all day on Saturdays. And, goodness, they take holidays seriously and give most everyone, even salespeople the day off. Many stores and some malls were closed on Labour (yes, Labour) Day, for instance.
I've managed most of it, except for car inspection and registration, which I hope to accomplish this month. Then I get to do a sort of system reboot in the new year, when I apply for permanent residency, which will ultimately mean different paperwork to complete. But first things first: I have to pass an English-language competency test in order to apply for permanent residency. And it will only cost me the bargain price of $265 CAD to do so.
Obviously the credentials from two American universities, the same that I had to present in order to get my work permit, mean next to nothing in terms of my functionaly literacy in my mother tongue.
The Catch 22 of Canadian bureaucracy aside, there are minor struggles. Spelling and language usage continue to confuse me, so maybe an English test is in order after all. Canadian English is like listening to an old familiar tune that suddenly strikes a . . . let's say "different" rather than "wrong" or "sour" note. It's bi-ling-ew-ul" and "proh-cess" and "proh-ject" and "ah-gainst" and "ree-zource," sometimes all in the same sentence. I'm gradually losing the sense of not so much what constitutes an American spelling but what is a Canadian versus a British versus an American spelling. At the moment I consider myself very much an American living in Canada, not a wannabe Canadian, as I might have desired 10 years ago. But I try to get along, so I'm gradually inserting some extra u's and -re's into every other word, whether they require it or not.
I'm having trouble with my tongue in more ways than one: Continuing to represent challenges are shopping and eating, two of my favorite pastimes.
In a previous post, I discussed the disconnect of shopping in Canada: How Wal-Mart is more like Target and thus not such a shameful experience as it is in the U.S. A couple of months later, and I find myself still confused. Holt Renfrew and Ogilvy are still too high-end for me, and in Toronto, Nordstrom and Saks are about to enter the market, making me outclassed in two countries and cultures. Simon is still planning to move into the TO market from Montreal, which would have been welcome six years ago when I could fit into their men's wear.
Speaking of shamefulness, I kinda miss Marshall's/Ross/T.J. Maxx, and I definitely miss DSW Shoe Warehouse, which I could use right about now, as fall sets in, and I long for a pair of half-boots to protect my tootsies from the rain. I've yet to bring myself to enter a Winners. That's just so wrong.
It's not just the stores and the schedules, though; the products are different, too. Let's start with the most important meal of the day, coffee: Peet's Coffee, my go-to brand in the States is so far, nonexistent. Ditto for Chobani Yogurt. The cereal aisle at the local supermarket is decidedly smaller, although I've managed to find overpriced Bran Buds and reasonably priced Quaker Oat Squares, along with a lot of the Kashi cereals. But then there are cereals like Vector by Kellogg's that sounds like something that would cause bodily harm if poured into the bowl the wrong way.
Despite the prevalence of a highly diverse population, even (or especially) in the suburbs, I have tried three supermarkets and come up anchovy-less--although if you need multi-flavored sardines, conger eel, or octopus in a can, I'm your man. Perhaps I'm misremembering this, but anchovies seemed pretty much a supermarket staple in the States. I'm not saying everybody or anybody much eats them, but you can find them at least. The Caesar salad situation in this nation is at crisis level, as you might imagine.
Southern food, Texas foods, and Mexican foods are also in very short supply, and even when you find them, you often end up with a brand you've never heard of or not exactly the product you're used to.
Grits, white corn? Check, finally found some at the local Loblaws, one variety by a firm named Ferma, a purveyor of Portuguese fine foods based in Montreal, tucked away in an odd amalgam of Asian, Indian, and Latin American foods. Hominy, golden? No, sorry, how about white corn hominy instead? Yes, that will do for pozole, which I'm making for dinner tonight (although experimenting by using chicken instead of pork, given the boyfriend's background). I could only find Goya brand, which I'm familiar with from my days in Texas, but none by any of the more Southern food purveyors that form my cultural strong suit.
Chipotle peppers in adobo sauce? Yes, but barely, intermingled with the red and green chile sauces, courtesy of La Costeña brand, another one I'm less certain of. Hatch green chiles from New Mexico? Well, yes, but only because I stocked up on them via Amazon before I left home. They've come in handy more than once, including for some impromptu Canada Votes election night nachos this past October 19.
None of this is bad, mind you, nor a deal-breaker nor any real hardship, of course. I'm starting to appreciate the prevalence of Lavazza coffee, both ground and whole bean, in the supermarket, and I'm starting to think the whole Chobani thing is one big, $1.50 per container scam. We have a brand of Greek yogurt in Canada, Skotidakis, that actually tastes and mouth-feels (if I must) like Greek yogurt--tart, thick, substantive--to which you can add honey or jam à la Fage. And if you don't like Greek active, then how about French passive in the form of Quebec's own Liberté brand? It's quite and quietly excellent.
Truth be told, I was troubled by the lack of access to grits, however, as well as hominy. Not that I ate either every day back home, but I knew I could get them when I wanted them, even in Pittsburgh. And then suddenly I could not.
And no matter how grim and horrid the Mexican food offerings were in Pittsburgh (and they were scandalously caca-esque), I knew I could find the good stuff somewhere, by visiting a Mexican store, asking for CARE packages from friends in Texas, or shopping on Amazon. While we have our very own Amazon.ca, import levies can jack up the prices for even the most mundane of purchases. Some cases in point: a 7-ounce can of chipotle peppers in Adobo from Goya is currently selling for $40 CAD (although I'm really hoping I've read that wrong, and there's a 12-pack or a case in the offing); Allen's golden hominy does come in pack of 12 but will cost you about $5 CAD per can; a 24-ounce container of Quaker 5-minute grits is currently listed on Amazon à la canadienne for $24.15 CAD, taxes and shipping not included; a 5-pound bag of Quaker Quick Grits sells for a staggering $146.52!
Forget gold, oil, and diamonds--clearly grit manufacturing should be the driver of Canada's economic engine. Golden hominy and hominy-related products are indeed just that--pure gold.
Saturday, October 31, 2015
Ghost town
Let me say first and foremost that I love the song "Ghost Town" by Madonna. I recently heard it on the stereo system while waiting impatiently for a flat white to be served up at a Second Cup near Bloor and Spadina, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, the World. I knew it was Madonna immediately, but, amazingly, had not heard it or anything else from her latest album, Rebel Heart. Then again, I have spent most of the year on the move: Looking for a job, interviewing for a job, waiting to get a job, starting a job, learning a job, etc., etc., etc. So no small wonder that I missed this musical gem.
I won't say this is what Madonna is known for doing best, the lush, heartbreaking ballad. Nonetheless, I personally think it is the sort of song she is excels at doing, this sort of moody, melodious ballad that touches and unsettles you. Like "Bad Girl" or "What It Feels Like for a Girl." It's the sort of thing she doesn't get enough credit for, the type of song in which she turns pop into art, for a brief, wondrous moment.
Oh, she gets more respect for her fierce "Bitch, I'm Madonna" attitude-filled videos and songs, but I've followed Madge for over 30 years now, enjoyed her music even before "Borderline" and "Lucky Star" opened all those doors and windows years ago, used to dream about being her friend, tolerated the undeserved hype around her appearance in Desperately Seeking Susan, still hear "Like a Virgin" in my head on a regular basis while strolling around in neoclassical settings on sun-dappled days (which happens more often than you might realize), and have even been known to compare her singing to that of Agnetha Fältskog (the plaintive-voiced goddess to whom I devote all my prayers) in, for example, "You'll See" or "Ghost Town," no small praise that . . . and I think she deserves major props for this aspect of her art.
And yet . . . this video do sucketh, in my humble opinion. Nuclear holocaust is so 1983, for pity's sake. And a cameo by Terence Howard? Puh-leez. He's the actor I like least in Empire, so much so that I was really hoping he (or rather his character) would die at the end of season 1.
I don't mean to unduly criticize Madonna. My opinion is that most music videos bite the proverbial big one nowadays. There may have been a very brief golden age (or at least a bronze or iron age) of music video in the early '80s and since then, with rare exception, it's been women gyrating exotically or rubbing themselves erotically, guys looking earnest and sensitive when they are neither, and overwrought versions of cannibalized pop cultural touchstones that I don't give a rat's patoot about anyway. Mad Max meets a bunch of Lord of the Rings and Star Wars references, not to forget Game of Thrones and whatever else TV show I don't pay any attention to. Just add video hoes and super fly gangstas.
I blame myself in part for not caring anymore. I mean, if it doesn't happen on an Australian or South African soap opera these days, or maybe Empire or Nashville, I can't be arsed to know.
But more than anything, I blame Madonna.
Sister Christian, you got us into this iconographical mess sometime around the time of "Like a Prayer" and "Express Yourself." It's about damned time that you got us out of it. Get Guy Ritchie on the phone stat. He needs some inspiration himself after The Man from U.N.C.L.E. Just don't mention Swept Away, and y'all will be fine.
Sunday, September 20, 2015
Gendered slanguage
![]() |
| "Andy Bell & Vince Clarke of Erasure at Wolfgang's (nightclub) - San Francisco, California, USA" - by Nancy. J. Price, AndWhatsNext - CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Baddabing. I'm
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)












